Print page

Food Stamp Receipt and Responses to Six Household Food Security Questions (15.7.1)

Table 15.7.1 examines the associations between responses to the food security questions in the client survey and their food stamp participation.

Table 15.7.1
FOOD STAMP RECEIPT AND RESPONSES TO SIX HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITY QUESTIONS

 

 

Food Stamp Receipt Status of Households

 

All Client Households

Receiving Food Stamps

Apparently Eligible, not Receiving

Apparently Ineligible Because of Income, not Receiving a

Food didn’t last; no money to buy more b

 

 

 

 

Often true

32.8%

36.8%

32.4%

19.9%

Sometimes true

42.8%

43.6%

43.5%

36.1%

Never true

24.3%

19.6%

24.0%

44.0%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

48,196

18,902

24,573

4,721

Couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals b

 

 

 

 

Often true

25.4%

25.4%

26.9%

17.9%

Sometimes true

41.2%

42.6%

41.8%

33.0%

Never true

33.3%

32.0%

31.3%

49.0%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

48,170

18,866

24,595

4,709

Cut size/skip meals because not enough food c

 

 

 

 

Almost every month

25.3%

28.6%

25.0%

14.1%

Some months but not every month

18.9%

18.7%

19.5%

16.9%

Only one or two months

6.9%

7.1%

7.1%

5.8%

Never

48.8%

45.6%

48.4%

63.0%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

47,753

18,683

24,384

4,686

Ever ate less than should because no moneyd

 

 

 

 

Yes

52.9%

55.7%

53.9%

37.2%

No

47.1%

44.3%

46.1%

62.8%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

48,389

18,942

24,723

4,724

Ever hungry but didn’t eat because no money d

 

 

 

 

Yes

39.5%

41.4%

40.7%

25.8%

No

60.5%

58.6%

59.3%

74.2%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

48,433

18,933

24,768

4,732

Ever not eat for whole day because no money d

 

 

 

 

Yes

26.9%

28.6%

27.8%

15.8%

No

73.1%

71.4%

72.2%

84.2%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

48,516

18,981

24,794

4,741

Note:   
In calculating percentages and sample sizes, we excluded item nonresponses to all variables involved.

a Eligibility was determined based on the previous month’s income alone.
b Statistically significant based on chi-square test (d.f. = 4) at the 1% level.
c Statistically significant based on chi-square test (d.f. = 6) at the 1% level.
d Statistically significant based on chi-square test (d.f. = 2) at the 1% level.

Overall, households receiving food stamps and households that appear to be eligible but are not receiving food stamps have similar response patterns.  Further, both these groups are substantially more likely to provide responses that indicate food insecurity than the households who appear to be ineligible for food stamps.

  • 36.8% of food stamp recipients and 32.4% of apparently eligible nonparticipants said that it was “often true” that food didn’t last and there was no money to buy more; the comparable percentage for apparently ineligible A2H clients was much lower (19.9%).
  • 55.7% of food stamp recipients and 53.9% of apparently eligible nonparticipants said they eat less than they should because they lack money to buy food; the comparable figure for the apparently ineligible respondents was 37.2%.
  • Similar patterns are observed for the responses to the other questions.