Print page

Satisfaction with Services at Food Programs (9.2)

Clients were asked how satisfied they were with the amount, variety, and overall quality of food provided at the emergency food programs.  Clients were also asked how often they were treated with respect by the staff of those programs.  Table 9.2.1 summarizes the findings.

Table 9.2.1
SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES AT FOOD PROGRAMS

Level of Satisfaction with Various Aspects of the Service Provided to Clients or Others in the Household:

Adult Clients Who Pick Up Food at a Pantry

Adult Clients at a Kitchen

Adult Clients at a Shelter

Adult Clients at All Program Sites

Amount of food provided

 

 

 

 

Very satisfied

59.6%

63.2%

52.7%

59.7%

Somewhat satisfied

33.0%

29.5%

31.0%

32.3%

Somewhat dissatisfied

6.1%

4.6%

9.0%

6.0%

Very dissatisfied

1.3%

2.7%

7.3%

2.0%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Variety of food provided

 

 

 

 

Very satisfied

56.7%

59.1%

43.6%

56.2%

Somewhat satisfied

34.0%

30.3%

35.1%

33.4%

Somewhat dissatisfied

7.7%

6.6%

11.4%

7.8%

Very dissatisfied

1.7%

4.0%

9.9%

2.7%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Overall quality of food provided

 

 

 

 

Very satisfied

62.3%

60.4%

45.9%

60.8%

Somewhat satisfied

31.6%

31.2%

37.0%

31.9%

Somewhat dissatisfied

4.9%

4.7%

8.5%

5.2%

Very dissatisfied

1.1%

3.6%

8.6%

2.1%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Frequency at which clients are treated with respect by the staff who distribute food

 

 

 

 

All of the time

84.6%

80.9%

65.9%

82.7%

Most of the time

7.0%

10.1%

18.3%

8.3%

Some of the time

2.2%

5.2%

8.9%

3.2%

Never

0.3%

0.7%

2.8%

0.6%

Never came before

5.9%

3.0%

4.1%

5.3%

TOTAL

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

SAMPLE SIZE (N)

37,986

10,667

4,225

52,878

Source:        
This table was constructed based on usable responses to questions 53 and 54 of the client survey.

Notes:     
The percentages presented in this table are based only on usable responses, excluding missing, don’t know, and refusal responses.  All usable responses were weighted as described in Chapter 3 and in the Technical Appendix volume to represent all emergency food clients of the A2H National Network.  The sample sizes (N) also include missing data.

For amount of food provided, missing, don’t know, and refusal responses combined are 9.6% for pantry clients, 5.3% for kitchen clients, 5.4% for shelter clients, and 8.6% for all clients.

For variety of food provided, missing, don’t know, and refusal responses combined are 9.8% for pantry clients, 5.4% for kitchen clients, 7.1% for shelter clients, and 8.9% for all clients.

For overall quality of food provided, missing, don’t know, and refusal responses combined are 10.0% for pantry clients, 4.7% for kitchen clients, 5.9% for shelter clients, and 1.4% for all clients.

For client treatment by staff, missing, don’t know, and refusal responses combined are 3.3% for pantry clients, 2.9% for kitchen clients, 3.0% for shelter clients, and 3.2% for all clients.

Across all three kinds of emergency food programs, the level of satisfaction among clients is high.  92.0% are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the amount of the food they receive at the programs.  Client satisfaction with specific aspects of the programs follows:

  • 89.6% of the clients are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the variety of the food.
  • 92.7% of the clients are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with overall quality of the food.
  • 82.7% of the clients say that they are treated with respect by the staff all the time.

Chart_9.2.1.jpg